Sunday, August 28, 2016

Beowulf and that Time He Boasted...a Lot

I read the story of Beowulf way back in 8th grade, so my memory of the story is pretty much that Grendel killed lots of people and Beowulf came to save everyone else. I don't remember enjoying the experience of reading it, but we shall see how round two goes. So far, meh... I forgot how hard some of these names are to pronounce! Other than my struggle to say some of the names, I found reading aloud is pretty helpful!

Moving forward into my thoughts thus far, I kept thinking about how it seems Beowulf is boasting and bragging about himself but I think he's under the impression that he's humble... Kind of...? Maybe I'm just interpreting it wrong, but it just seems to me that he really likes to go on and on about his accomplishments. I mean come on dude! Did you not have any help (because if you truly did all you say did on your own, then DAMN good for you bro)?! I'd like other people's thoughts on his self confidence and ego! Do you really think he is all that?



I also would like to hear other opinions about Grendel. I'm kind of confused as to what he is exactly. For some very strange reason I've always imagined Jabba the Hutt when I hear Grendel's name (even in 8th grade), and I'm not really sure why...? Also I know he's mad about everything and eats people (because wouldn't you do that if you were shunned and mad? Maybe he's just really hangry?!), but I'm not entirely clear as to what the situation is there and why the Scyldings didn't bother asking for some help.


Beowulf: Guiding New Christians?

Before we started reading Beowulf, I thought the story would be more or less a Nordic/Anglo-Saxon version of a Greek epic poem, like the Odyssey. It would center on Beowulf, an epic hero who fights a monster named Grendel and probably does other things. There might be mythical creatures other than Grendel (and his mother, whom I heard shows up at some point later). There might be polytheistic gods. Would they be Norse? Celtic? Otherwise?

Very otherwise. Pagan gods get a few mentions—not by name, but as if gesturing vaguely to a category—but the god Beowulf worships is one god. The Christian god, who hereafter will be capitalized for clarity’s sake.

If God is to be involved in this epic poem, will He take the role that other gods have in other epics, or that He has in Bible stories? Yes and no. Let’s examine two passages. The first is in lines 175-181, at the end of chapter II:

“At times they offered honor to idols
at pagan temples, prayed aloud
that the soul-slayer might offer assistance
in the country’s distress. Such was their custom,
the hope of heathens—they remembered hell
in their minds, they did not know the Maker,
the Judge of deeds, they did not know the Lord God” (175-181).

If this were a tale in the Old Testament, this would be the part when God would pick one human to tell all the other humans that God is furious at them for worshipping other gods, that they are a bunch of idolatrous whores, that He refuses to hear them, and that He is abandoning them forever . . . for real this time! (He would then be back by the next book, if not the very next chapter. He always comes back.)



In Beowulf, however, God does not take the role of intervening deity. What follows this passage and concludes the chapter is a sermon on the importance of seeking the Lord. Uh, okay. Was this small dose of evangelism to remind the original audiences of their new Christian faith? Perhaps.


The second passage concerns specifically the faith of the story’s hero. Beowulf chooses to fight Grendel—a giant, human-eating fiend of a monster—barehanded because Grendel “does not care for weapons” (434). Also, Beowulf says of his upcoming fight, “Let him put his faith / in the Lord’s judgment, whom death takes” (440-441). Among our hero’s qualities, then, is his faith. His own mortal strength can take him only so far; God takes him farther. This indirect divine influence reminded me of a specific Bible story: David and Goliath. Goliath, like Grendel, is a giant who attacks a human community until a hero defeats him. David and Beowulf are noticeably different: David is “little more than a boy” ( 1 Sam 17:42), has no previous combat experience, and overall looks neither formidable nor intimidating. Beowulf, on the other hand, is recognizably an adult. He is a seafarer, a warrior, and a leader. He already has a reputation in the surrounding communities. What’s the connection, then? The heroes’ faith. “David said to [Goliath], ‘You come against me with sword and spear and javelin, but I come against you in the name of the Lord Almighty. . . . This day the Lord will deliver you into my hands’” (1 Sam 17:45-46).  Both David and Beowulf, regardless of their natural abilities and resources, ensure victory by their faith in God. Since Beowulf’s original audiences would have held the hero in high esteem, his faith would be a model for them to follow.

Given the hero's Christian faith and a brief sermon within the text, perhaps the poem functioned in part as a reminder to a community new to the religion.

I pledge that I have neither given nor received any unauthorized aid on this assignment.

Not Quite The Wolf Guy I Pictured...

So basically I never read Beowulf and quite frankly, I never had much desire to. A lot of my friends in high school read it, but I must have skillfully avoided that requirement, because I haven't had to touch the poem until today. Honestly, I wasn't sure what to expect. I knew that there was a Beowulf movie, and although I have never seen it, I know that the main character is a wolf (at least I think so, anyway). I was kind of expecting Beowulf to be a strange werewolf guy or something of that nature, and I must say that I was a little disappointed when I discovered that this guy didn't have fangs. Lame.

So anyway, after I got over my extreme disappointment, I realized that this poem is actually really cool. My high school friends were totally wrong about it being boring. I do have to say that the old English references are a little rough and the fact that I have to keep checking the footnotes gets a little frustrating, but once you get past that aspect of it, the poem is really interesting. I, of course, got super into it when Grendel was introduced. 
The history of Beowulf was cool and everything, but when I started to read about a "fiend from hell" (101) that was "grim and ravenous" (121) my interest was piqued. Of course, at the end of our reading it appears as though Grendel is defeated... 

Would it be wrong for me to hope that this isn't the case? Aside from Beowulf himself, I think Grendel is one of the coolest characters in the poem. I'm kind of rooting for him, but of course, I have to say that I hope Beowulf comes out on top. I guess I'm just going to have to be patient and see what happens next!

Beowulf: the "prince charming" of Anglo-Saxons

So, kicking things off with Beowulf didn't exactly make me excited to read... I was first introduced to this epic poem in sophomore year of high school and was not exactly thrilled by the story (difficult old English translations and such)... but as I remembered the jest of the story I figured it could possibly be more fun to read now that I have all these reading skills under my belt. And indeed it is, I actually find the poem to be entertaining to read! However, the background covered on Hrothgar is a tad confusing, considering that his father's predecessor was named Beowulf,
but doesn't appear to have any relation whatsoever to Beowulf, the "monster-slaying hero of the title" (55).
But it doesn't seem to matter in the grand scheme of this epicness.
Anyways..
I see the purpose in the long Scylding history lesson as giving the poet a chance to develop the horrible distress of the Danes. They are proud and lively people that like to celebrate their success and riches of war with giant feasts in Heorot, like Kings and Queens celebrating with all their people. But in the middle of all the happiness, Grendel has to come and crash the party!
And I know that it may seem a little far fetched, but I draw a slight parallel to the (Disney version) story of Sleeping beauty...allow me to explain: The king and queen have a lovely daughter, Aurora (aka Briar Rose) and so they celebrate the birth of their daughter. Similarly, the Danes are greatly successful and celebrate their power by building a grand mead-house. In Sleeping Beauty, a witch comes along and she's evil of course, so she curses Aurora (sleeping for 100 years when she pricks her finger at age 15). And obviously the bad guy in Beowulfs story is Grendel the "fiend from hell" (line 101)...he comes along and eats 30 guys which is kind of horrible. Both the curse on Aurora and Grendels relentless killing continue on and on until along comes the knight in shining amour!! Which is where Prince Phillip and Beowulf come along to save the distressed princess/Danes. So, basically, I'm comparing and old English epic poem to a cutesy princess tale. But either way, Beowulf is essentially prince charming.

Why the heck does Beowulf remind me of Thor?

In all honesty, I thought this book would be extremely boring. I mean, who wants to read a Middle English book with some weird language and a story that is not relatable to people of today? Well then, how come I keep seeing parallels between Beowulf and Thor? Even Grendel reminds me of Loki. Some of you might not see any correlation between the two, so allow me to show you what I see.

In lines 106 to 108, Grendel is compared to Cain from the book of Genesis in the bible. For those who don't know, Cain killed his brother, Abel, in order to be the favorite son. Loki basically does this by sending a giant robot, that shoots a fire-laser out of its face, to kill Thor so that he can become king of Asgard.

Not too different from Grendel, who is a descendant of Cain. In lines 136-137, Grendel “mourned not at all/for his feuds and sins.” Loki killed a lot of people in the first Avengers movie, heck he even gouges out someone's eye.



All Grendel and Loki wanted was to rule over the people using fear; “one against all (145).”





 One last point, Loki is a frost giant and Grendel is a giant; therefore, Grendel = Loki.

Beowulf is totally Thor. Line 418, Beowulf says that he is known for his “might of…strength.” Plus he says that he has fought a “tribe of giants,” another thing Thor has done before. In lines 431-432, Beowulf says,“ I might alone, o my own band of earls/and this hardy troop,” will defeat Grendel. Could Beowulf’s band of earls and hardy troop be similar to Thor’s Lady Sif and the Warriors Three?

 
That's what it looks like to me. In line 670, Beowulf is describe as “the Maker’s favor,” in other words, he is blessed by God. Something that many people don’t know about Thor is that his hammer, Mjöllnir, was not only a weapon, but was used to bless marriages, births, and funerals. http://norse-mythology.org/symbols/thors-hammer/ So in this case, Thor is the one giving the blessings. Lastly, in lines 818-819, “Beowulf was given/glory in battle.” I wonder who else has glory in battle? You guessed it; Thor.
 
You may disagree with me, but I’m pretty sure Beowulf and Thor are practically the same person. Fight me if you want to but the similarities are there.


Holy Hashem, Batman! There's an awful lot of Christianity in this ancient epic!

For what is, according to the introduction, an ancient story about Germanic people in a pre-Christian society (Liuzza12), the Christian God sure has a lot of heft in this epic poem.

And I do mean Christian. The imagery and ethics we've seen in Beowulf aren't remotely Jewish. A lot of people like to throw around the word "Judeo-Christian" when they're talking about totally Christian things. This is one of my pet peeves. The term definitely has its use in the right time and place, but it's wildly overused. To illustrate my point, here is a brief list of Christian things people try to rope us Jews into:
  • Sin.
  • Damnation.
  • Salvation.
  • Hell.
None of these things exist in Judaism, and a lot of the religious rhetoric in what we've read of Beowulf is based on these key concepts. This story is peddling a Christian narrative, not a Jewish one. Please believe me when I say I could go on indefinitely about Christianity being thrust into Judaism. Suffice it to say that a lot of goyim (translation: gentiles) don't know a thing about Jewish religion and culture and push Christian concepts and values onto Jewish ones. Goyim gonna goy.


In any case, the two scribes that penned our single remaining original Beowulf manuscript certainly pushed their religious views onto this story (Liuzza 11). Grendel isn't just a monster; he's "God's adversary" (786) and a "captive of Hell" (787), and God has "condemned him among Cain's race" (106-107). Likewise, Beowulf isn't just a prince or a war hero; he's a warrior that "[God's] grace has guided" (382) to the Danes in order to save them from their "demon foe" (706), plus Beowulf has the added bonus of being blessed with "the Maker's favor" (670). I don't know about you, but I'm sensing a general theme. It's not particularly subtle.

Heroic stories follow a series of archetypal themes that broadly apply to most myths, legends, and folktales around the world, but stories from different cultures have different nuances that reflect the individual societal identities and values of their places and people of origin. I'm curious to know how much the story of Beowulf changed as Christian imagery was retroactively added to it.

I would also love to learn how applying Christian influence to a fairly localized ethnic myth affected the story's original audience. I know that a lot Christian myth, ritual, and iconography were influenced by religions that predated or existed around it and about how that generally popularized conversion to Christianity. I can't help but wonder if Beowulf was used as a tool to convert the heathen masses.

Although God is rather awkwardly shoved into the story, Beowulf is still an interesting and engaging read. We're actually getting pretty close to my favorite part! I've read two other translations before, but I'm looking forward reading this version for the first time!